Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Fanboys is a complete bore





Oh my, what a complete bore of a movie.

Oh my where to start? Well first off is Dan Fogler who is this filthy looking long haired dude who looks way to old to be hanging with these guys. Then we have Chris Marquette who is this Star Wars nerd who takes it way too seriously and to throw in some unneeded drama we learn that he has cancer. Jay Baruchel plays the stereotypical nerd with glasses. Sam Huntington plays the only character who seems to have grown up at all. In fact I would have liked to see a movie about his character at the car dealership and his dad.

The road trip is composed of typical hijinks such as a fight between them and Trekkies, the gay biker bar, the getting high camp fire scene, getting thrown in jail and a side trip to Vegas. None of it laugh out loud funny. Most of it is just embarrassing.

The highlight is the cameos by Billie Dee Williams, William Shatner, .Carrie Fisher, Kevin Smith and Jason Mewes. And when the cameos are the highlight you know that the film is a bore. You would think that they at least would throw in a George Lucas cameo. If you're going to make a movie about Star Wars you need to include the man who created it.

The entire cancer subplot wasn't needed at all. It simply doesn't work for me and actually seems forced into the story.

I swear I laugh more at the Robot Chicken or Family Guy spoofs than this movie.

Friday, October 30, 2009

King Kong(1976)


First I will not be comparing this to either the 1933 or 2005 versions, but on it's own merits.

First and foremost it's what was then present day 1976.

One of the first things we see is a "drunk" guy dropping a huge wad of cash by a gate guard and he's allowed in. Basically a bribe. We also see that he was never drunk. Soon this same guy sneaks aboard an oil exploration ship and becomes a stowaway. Soon he interrupts a meeting where we learn he is from Princeton's Department of Primate Paleontology and he offers to pay for his passage.

So some points from that. If he's from Princeton and had enough money to bribe the gate guard and then offer to pay for his passage then why stowaway first? I'm sure that back in 1976 it was illegal to be a stowaway, so even though he offers to pay later it's still wrong.So what do we know by his actions, he offers bribes and stowaways aboard a ship. So he's not a honest law-abiding person at all.

At the meeting it's learned that they are en route to an island where they believe they will find oil. They show an old 1943 photo taken by the Navy that shows a fog bank. Then another photo taken two weeks ago that shows the same fog bank. So we have a fog bank that doesn't move a wisp in 35 years. Then we are told that a NASA spy satellite went off course and photographed the area by mistake. This same satellite was supposed to analyze exhaust gases from a missile test so it was loaded with 2 special kinds of film. We see am infrared image of the island that's hidden by a "perpetual fog bank". Then a spectrograph image too that shows that the chemical composition of the fog bank is thought to be from "vapors from petroleum deposits." Oh but Jack Prescott interrupts and says that the fog bank is from "animal respiration", "animal breathing". We also learn from Jack that people have indeed been on the island before telling stories of a "huge, slouchy humanoid thing."

So some more points from this:
In 1976 we are supposed to believe that nobody has been on this island even though by that time much more of the worlds oceans have been explored. That two world wars have been fought on the oceans and that no navy has even seen this island. Oh yeah because some fog bank hides it. So I guess the worlds navys are just too scared to travel through some fog bank. Not only that but what about all the planes? I guess not a single plane ever bothered to fly up and over the fog bank either and see what's beyond it. And then we also supposed to believe that until this date that no satellite in orbit ever even noticed this fog bank and island. Or that not weather man ever noticed a fog bank that hasn't moved in 35 years. Being that the first weather satellite was launched in 1960 it's seems highly unlikely that nobody would have never noticed a fog bank that hasn't moved in 16 years.


Then we have Jack Prescott, a primate paleontologist who actually believes that a constant fog bank is created from an animal breathing? What??

Next we see the introduction of the other main character in the story, Dwan. How is she introduced? Well she's lying in a small raft, all wet in a skimpy black dress and for some reason in a sexy pose. She comes to and it seems that she's really out of it, perhaps on something. She's a wannabe actress. She's the lone survivor of a boat explosion. Even though she learns that she shows little to no emotion that those from that boat died. Her name is from 'Dawn' but she switched the 2 letters to make it more memorable. And then she says "Did you ever meet anyone before whose life was saved by Deep Throat?" in the most ditzy, air-headed ways I've ever heard.

So 24 minutes in and we see our first glimpse of the fog bank. Jack, who has now become their official photographer, takes about a dozen quick photos of the fog bank. Um, why? One or two is enough, but 12 of the same thing from the same point of view, rather pointless and a waste of film. They lay anchor right outside of the fog bank and use their radar and find the island. Why hasn't any other ship ever done that before? Not even the Navy? Jack takes another 9 or so quick shots of Fred at the radar, again why? One or two is enough, not 9 or so. It's rather clear that Jack loves to waste film and isn't much of a photographer. He also take lots of photos on the beach.

They recon on the island and come across a giant wall. Jack fiddles around with the camera. Even though he loved to take dozens of photos of a fog bank and of the beach he doesn't even take a single photo of something as mysterious as a giant wall. They come across the natives ceremony where he does take just a few photos. I guess Jack just loves to take photos of a fog bank the most.

They are discovered watching and Fred asks Jack to talk for them. Why? He's a primate Paleontologist, what would he knows about natives dialect?

Soon they are back on the boat. Jack is stealing supplies to go on some sort of "camera hunt" by himself. So we learn that Jack not only bribes and stowaways, but also steals. Not to subtly Jack hints at a sexual rendezvous with Dwan. She's easily kidnapped by the natives. So Dwan wakes up and finds herself in the middle of the native ceremony. She doesn't put up a fight at all and just goes along with it.

After about 53 minutes we finally see our first glimpse of Kong as a set of eyes moves through the trees.When we first see a full size shot of Kong , what do we see? An upright standing ape-like creature. Kong takes her.

They come to her rescue but it's too late. To Fred's statement that "Someone's taken her." Jack responds to him by saying "Who the hell do you think went through there, some guy in an ape suit?" I don't know if that was supposed to be a joke or not, but once I heard that it would affect how I would see the character of Kong from that point on.

So we next see Kong waking up and Dwan is close by just waking up as well. So I guess that throughout the entire night she never once tried to escape. She wakes up to see Kong watching her. Only now does she even try to escape by crawling around. She finally gets the sense to stand up and run. But since she runs in a straight line she's easily caught. She calls him a "goddamn chauvinist pig-ape!" How in the world is Kong a chauvinist? He is just an animal or as she calls him a "pig-ape". She hits him and then she says she is sorry and says "What a nice ape. Such a nice, sweet, nice, sweet monkey." After her annoying apology Kong puts her down and she again tries to escape by running in a straight line, but she trips and falls. Boy isn't that a cliche, a woman trips while being chased. Kong captures her once again.

Next we see Jack and company on the island searching for Dwan. Fred radios them and Jack says that "there is a girl out there who might be running for her life from some gigantic, turned-on ape!" How does Jack know that Kong maybe "turned-on"? He says to some of the men "radar has the ape heading in our direction".

This leads to what I find is the most vile, disgusting scene in the entire movie. The infamous waterfall bathing scene. So at first Dwan looks like she has no clue as to why she's at the waterfall and that Kong is holding her in it. But that changes as soon as Kong starts to blow on her to dry her off. She writhes around in ecstasy as if she's having the best sex in her entire life. The look of Kong is just hilarious. He has this perverted, sexual look on his face that I find sickening.

Fred soon gets the bad news that the oil he was hoping for won't be for another 10,000 years. That's when he gets the idea to capture Kong instead.

The log scene is next and is fairly good but is ends in only a few moments. Only Jack and Bone survive. Jack continues on by himself to rescue Dwan.

A plane drops supplies to the ship. A question is why didn't they use the airplane to make a quick recon of the island? From what I've seen of the island it would be fairly easy to spot something as large as Kong from the air.

It's nighttime again and yet again Kong is looking at Dwan in that perverted way. This time he uses his finger to rub Dwan's chest. But Kong's happy time will have to wait because this little interlude is interrupted by a giant snake. Jack rescues Dwan and Kong kills the snake.

So throughout the entire movie the only animals I saw was Kong and the giant snake. Nothing else. Shouldn't there be other animals on the island, what about other giant animals?

We learn that Kong is traveling at 22MPH and yet Jack and Dwan can escape without much problem. Oh sure Jack and Dwan jump off a small cliff into some water, but why can't Kong? As we learn later in the film he's not scared to go through water, but on the island he just finds another way down instead of just jumping in after them. Why?

Kong breaks through the gate and falls into a pit of chloroform. Right after he falls in all the natives comes out. Where were they all this time?

The very next thing we see is a huge oil tanker. Where did this come from? The ship they arrived at the island was small and the only thing they requested was an air drop. It would have taken days or weeks for the oil tanker to arrive at the island, by that time the chloroform would have lost it's affect. Did they just abandon that other boat?
Looking at the boat I wonder how they brought Kong on board. It can't be by plane. I didn't see any helicopters. The boat doesn't appear to have any cranes on deck.The grate that I assume he was lowered through looks too small. So how did they bring Kong on board?

Dwan says that "he risked his life to save me", so the first hint that she feels something for Kong. Then Jack says that because they took Kong that the natives will become drunks by next year. What?? Why would they become drunks? Where would they get the booze from? Did they leave an endless supply of booze on the island or something? That doesn't make much sense.

If Jack is so full of morals then why doesn't he say "Yes tear up my contract!" when Fred offers to do just that during their argument on board the oil tanker? Because he doesn't stand behind his own convictions.

Jack later says to Dwan "The ape had the right idea." Is that supposed to mean that he agrees with Fred when Fred said to Dwan that Kong tried to rape her. If so that's sick.

Her scarf or something falls into Kongs hold. But instead of being small, it looks like a small tablecloth when Kong catches it. Kong goes on a temper tantrum and they threaten to flood the tank and drown Kong. Dwan tries to calm Kong but falls into the hold. He catches her, let's her go and then she climbs out.

Next we are in NYC. Jack quits and calls it a tragedy and donated his advance to a fund to send Kong home. Dwan turns down Jacks advice to quit as well. But the show must go on.

At an outside arena we learn that this is being broadcast live around the world. Would the world really care? The wall opens up and we see a cheap looking giant gas pump. Fred keeps saying "Hail to the power" as if he's at some religious festival. The gas pump is lifted away and we see Kong in a metal cage with a cheap looking crown on his head. How did they get Kong in the cage? If he was sedated, how did they get him to stand up? Why didn't Kong even try to shake that stupid looking crown off of his head?

Well he breaks loose and everyone runs away. Several shots include the full size robot, which are so obvious. Fred gets stepped on and Jack & Dwan escape.

The police and military have the Queensborough Bridge blocked off as well as the Brooklyn.

Jack & Dwan board an elevated train. Kong sniffs the air. I suppose we are supposed to believe that Kong can smell Dwan from quite a distance among millions of other people. Kong stops the train which just so happens to be the same train the Jack & Dwan are on. They escape the train and Kong picks up a woman who looks like Dwan and throws her away. If Kong can smell Dwan from a distance then he should have known that the woman wasn't Dwan just by her scent.

Next Jack & Dwan cross a bridge where we learn that all the roads are mined. How did they mine the roads so quickly in only a few minutes?

Next Jack & Dwan are running down a road and Dwan insists that they stop for a drink. But Jack wants to go 10 more blocks to an apartment. Why does Jack want to go to an apartment so bad? Doesn't he trust anyone? Someone that could protect them? Is it the don't trust anyone over 30 message from the early 1970's? Don't trust the military or any authority figure?

Dwan says that Jack's book says that apes don't swim. And yet the next scene has Kong wading across the river. He next steps out of the water and contacts power lines, he roars with pain and lights up the sky and yet not a single person notices.

Jack soon discovers where Kong is headed and calls to tell them. While on the phone Kong happens to come across the very bar that they are at and Kong yet again takes her away. Even though she could have yelled for help, she doesn't until Kong is walking away with her.

Kong climbs up the WTC and Jack arrives as well. Both soon make it to the top.Some G.I.'s with flamethrowers are making their way to the top via what appears to be a window washing scaffolding thing. This doesn't make much sense as I'm fairly sure that the window washing device is automated and doesn't look anything like what they are standing on. I don't think the washing device even has an area for men to stand on. They reach the top and use the flamethrowers on Kong. He jumps to the other tower to escape. Kong then throws something at them and an explosion takes place. I assume the G.I.'s were killed. Jack yells "Yeah!!" and then calls the G.I.'s "Dirty Rotten bastards!"
I feel that it's wrong for Jack to seemingly take delight in the demise of those G.I.'s

The military helicopters arrive. Kong puts down Dwan, but she pleads with Kong to not do so. They open fire. Jack calls them "Assholes". Kong takes out at least one helicopter before falling to the ground. Dwan reaches out and Kong rolls over and falls to the ground below.

Kong is lying on the ground and his heart is beating slower and slower. Dwan soon arrives to see him die. She cries. The lights in his eyes dim as his heart stops.

Jack arrives below and tries to reach Dwan but can't. He just stops and she continues to cry.


There are so many things wrong with the film.

First and foremost is Kong himself. Throughout the film they can't quite make out what he is. At first he's called a humanoid thing, then Dwan calls him both an ape and a monkey. Even Jack, while on board the oil tanker, calls Kong an ape. Remember that Jack is a Primate paleontologist so he should know what an ape is.

So what is wrong with Kong?
He looks exactly like what it really was on set. A man in an ape suit. Rick Baker himself is reported to have wanted Kong to knuckle walk, but the filmmakers shot down his suggestion. There is nothing at all ape like about Kong. He doesn't move like an ape or even an ape like creature at all. He walks around like a man. Being that he walks upright like a human I almost expected Kong to actually talk.

So let's say that Kong is a bipedal ape. Fine. There are still things wrong with how Kong moves. Again it's too human like. The special effects ruins the overall effect in most scenes. Is it the speed of the film? The scale of both Kong and his surroundings? The bad sets, especially the island sets? Or is it all of those things?

The emotions of Kong. It seems to me that Kong only emotes two emotions throughout most of the film. Rage or being a "turned-on ape". I didn't see any signs of love, sadness, joy or other feelings/emotions. Just those two basic emotions.

The sounds of Kong. Again fairly limited. Basically just roaring with rage. No sounds of sadness, remorse or joy. Some of his roars sound like like sounds from the old 1950's dinosaur films, especially when he's on the WTC.



The direction: I don't know what the problem is, but I never felt like I was connecting with the movie. I was merely watching what was happening. The direction was off putting and distant. I felt little connection between any of the characters. I didn't like any of the characters.


The characters:
Jack is a bribing stowaway. He doesn't trust authority figures, the military or anyone over 30. Is willing to break laws for his own personal benefit. He leaves Dwan standing alone at the end of the film. Nothing likable at all about the character.

Dwan is a an air-headed ditz who seems to be on something for most ot the film. For most of the film it seems that all she cares about is her career. Yet we are supposed to believe at the end that she cares for Kong.

Fred Wilson is a self centered man who's only focus is oil and himself. He'll use anyone or anything for his own benefit.

So right off the bat we have three people who share something in common, They are self centered people who's only main concern is themselves.

Kong is, well whatever he is. A humanoid thing or an ape as both Dwan and Jack call him. He comes across as nothing more than an animal with anger management issues as well as being a sexual pervert.

The story:
As I pointed out above there are many problems with the basic premise of the story. Some may feel that the update works, but I don't. Setting it in 1976 raises too many questions,
1. How can an island remain undiscovered even though the Navy photographed the fog bank in 1943? Are we supposed to believe that even though the Navy was within yards of the fog that they never even dared to travel through it?
2. Surely an airplane at some point would have flown above the fog bank and discovered the island the lies behind it.
3. Satellites surely would have seen the island. How come nobody ever noticed that a fog bank hasn't moved in years and years on satellite photos/data?

So it's just unbelievable that the island would have remained undiscovered by civilized people until 1976.

We are supposed to take seriously a primate paleontologist who actually thinks that a constant fog bank is created by a single ape. Sure apes don't swim, but it never crosses his mind that they could wade through water.

A film that villafies the military and actually has a character who cheers when they are killed and calls them names.

The island itself looks like any ordinary tropical island. There is nothing interesting or unique about it. It's not a character at all.

Life on the island. There seems to be no animal life at all on the island except for Kong and a giant snake. On a tropical island it should be full of life and yet if seems devoid of life. This lack of life makes the island very dull and unrealistic.

The sets. The island sets are rather cheap. Poorly done. Regardless of the angle the island sets look like island sets which ruins the illusion. The NYC sets fair slightly better, but again are obvious sets.

The effects. I already mentioned how Kong's movements ruin the overall effects, so let's look at the other aspects.
The giant hand is very well done, but the hand looks too leathery. The Kong face is done very well and allows the limited emotions to come through. The Kong full size suit is good.
All of the Kong things are good it's just the way that Kong moves that ruins the effect.

Compositing is fairly bad especially in the helicopter finale. The copters move behind in a jerky hap-hazzard way.



Are there things I like. Well it's few and far between.
I do like that the journey takes place fairly early. I do like Grodins acting. I do like aspects of Kongs suit and hand/arm. I do like that the scene where Kong jumps from one tower to the other. I did like when the lights in Kongs eyes dim as he dies.

I don't like the 1976 setting. The way Kong moves even though he's called an ape. I don't like Kong's limited emotions and vocalizations. I don't like the characters. I don't like some of the acting which seems stilted and unconvincing. I don't like the direction. I don't like the way the military is portrayed. The musical score is lackluster is isn't memorable, it simply doesn't evoke emotion.

Overall a highly flawed film that can't stand on it's own merits. Overall I found it boring and not thrilling or dramatic at all.I felt nothing for Kong at the end which clearly shows that the film simply didn't work for me.
On a scale of 1-10, I would rate it a 3.

I have not even mentioned the other two Kong films, but when compared to those this one doesn't even come close.

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Fun with Dick and Jane review


Dick Harper (Jim Carrey) is promoted to VP of Communications at Globodyne Corporations he thinks he's got it made. His wife, Jane (Tea Leoni) quits her job because of his promotion. However, Globodyne tanks and soon their life goes from great to terrible as their lawn is repossessed, their electricity is turned off, turning in their leased car and selling their possessions. Eventually they are forced to become armed robbers.

The Film:

Where do I start. The film is very unfunny for most of the first hour. There just isn't anything really funny until they actually forced to become robbers. Until that happens we are forced to watch unfunny skits about their misfortunes such as Jane's cosmetics test, stealing the neighbors grass and plants and watching them fail at new jobs.

It doesn't get somewhat funny until they actually start robbing places. But even some of those fall flat and even those that are funny only bring a smile or a short chuckle. Eventually they scheme to steal 400 million dollars from their ex-boss and there are some funny moments in the finale. But it's too little too late.

Jim & Tea try their best with the script as do their costars, but it's to no avail. For a comedy it fails for it never made me laugh out loud once. For a 90 minute film it seemed so much longer.

Even Jim Carrey fans will find this one lacking. In fact I feel sorry for Jim to have been cast in this mess.

Can you tell I didn't like it much. I'd say skip it.

Features:

First we get a 3 minute montage of bloopers. Some of which is funnier than what wound up in the film itself.

Next we get 6 deleted scenes. Just more dull scenes that deserved to be deleted and none would have helped the film anyways.

Press Junket Highlights runs about 4 minutes and is exactly what is sounds like. A few smiles, but nothing laugh out loud funny here either.

Audio Commentary: Sorry didn't listen to it. Just not going to watch the film again just to listen to it, it's just not worth it.

Conclusion:

A huge letdown. A comedy that almost completely lacks in anything that would make me laugh out loud. Sure there are a few funny moments, but they are absent from almost the first hour of the film. The last half hour is really the only thing that's even remotely funny. But it's simply too little too late for what may perhaps be one of the saddest attempts at a comedy I've seen in years.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Alpha Dog review


Alpha Dog is an underrated film that many have overlooked.

In either case here is my review.

The Film:
The film starts out with a montage of home movies of children playing while the song "Over the Rainbow" plays over it. A great way to begin. Truly representing the idea of innocence & as the story unfolds of innocence lost.

The basic premise of the film is that Johnny Truelove(Emile Hirsch) is a drug dealer who eventually kidnaps Zack (Anton Yelchin), the younger brother of Jake (Ben Foster) over a debt and held as collateral to get the money. While kidnapped Zack actually starts to bond with his captors. He even has several chances to escape but doesn't because of his love for his brother as well as his misplaced trust that his captors won't harm him. Zack is often placed in the care of Frankie (Justin Timberlake) with whom he creates a bond with. As each witness is shown on screen their names & witness # appears briefly on screen.

Eventually they are over their heads and clearly not thinking straight. Johnny orders Elvis(Shawn Hatosy) to kill the kid. All of them are arrested for the crime, except for Johnny who flees the country. The final scene is of Johnny in Paraguay with a caption stating that he was arrested on August 10,2005.

Performances:

Emile Hirsch gives a very good performance as Johnny. According to what I've read his portrayal of the real life counterpart is very close. While Emile isn't exactly an imposing actor, his character never was meant to be. He's a kid, a poser, a wanna be who gets way over his head and panics and doesn't know what to do.

Justin Timberlake is the real surprise. I suspect that many overlooked this film because of him. He gives perhaps the best performance out of the entire film and his character is really the emotional connection we have with the film and Zack.

Anton Yelchin is also good. His portrayal of the kidnapped kid is quite subtle. You can feel his pain especially in the final scene on top of the hill.

Ben Foster is good, but for me perhaps a tad over the top at times. While I am not friends of anyone who uses drugs, I can't really judge his performance as one.

Chris Marquette is just ok in the few scenes that he's in.

Bruce Willis is also very good in his glorified cameo as Johnny's dad.

Sharon Stone is great as the mother of Zack. There has been much made of the "fat suit" scene, while the fat suit does hamper that scene I think her performance shines through and overcomes the badly done makeup in that scene.

Harry Dean Stanton: While I like him as an actor and all, I just can't get past how old he looks in the film. I don't know if it's me or not, but he doesn't look too well.

Amanda Seyfried gives perhaps the films only really bad performance in the film as the "That's Hot" girl.

The Direction:

I liked the way Nick takes his time to let the audience to get to know the characters, especially the bonding between Zack & Frankie. While some may say it's boring, I like films that show details of it's characters. I didn't really care for the split screen use during a few scenes. I also understand that there was to have been court room scenes in the film, but these were either never filmed or deleted from the film. The film really needed closure, which we really don't get. Sure we get recaps of the sentences most of them received, but since the film was completed way before the real life case of JJH even went to trial it's left open-ended.

The Special Features:

All we get on the dvd is two very lacking extras.

The first is an 11 minute featurette about the making of the film called "A Cautionary Tale: The Making of Alpha Dog". It's your standard featurette that features some interviews, behind the scenes footage and clips of the film. Nothing really special. What's surprising is that they don't mention the real life case that the film is based/inspired by.

The second extra is a useless thing called "Witness Timeline" which is really just a gallery of the "Witnesses" who witnessed the crimes and we see their "testimonials" and given the chance to view their scene in the film itself.

This film really deserves better extras than this. It really needs audio commentaries, deleted scenes and in depth documentaries not only about the film, but the real life case it's based/inspired upon.


Conclusion:

I highly recommend this film. It's not for everyone as the subject matter doesn't appeal to many. The R Rating is much deserved, if you can't handle cuss words, sex, drug use and violence then steer clear. But if you can handle the subject matter, the please don't overlook this film.


Hello

Hello and welcome to my first blog.

I will be posting reviews of DVDs asap.